🔗 Share this article

For Natalia Molina and longtime Mexican American, the most memorable moment of the baseball championship didn't occur during the tense final game on Saturday, when her squad executed multiple death-defying escape act after another before prevailing in extra innings against the opposing team.

It came in the previous game, when two supporting athletes, the Puerto Rican player and Miguel Rojas, executed a electrifying, game-winning sequence that simultaneously upended numerous negative misconceptions touted about Latinos in the past decades.

The moment in itself was stunning: the outfielder charged in from left field to snag a ball he initially misjudged in the stadium lights, then threw it to the infield to secure another, decisive out. Rojas, at second base, received the ball just a split second before a runner barreled into him, knocking him to the ground.

This was not merely a great sporting achievement, possibly the decisive turn in momentum in the Dodgers' direction after appearing for much of the series like the weaker side. For Molina, it was thrilling, on multiple levels, a much-required uplift for Latinos and for Los Angeles after a period of immigration raids, security forces monitoring the neighborhoods, and a steady stream of negativity from official sources.

"The players put forth this counter-narrative," said Molina. "The world saw Latinos displaying an infectious pride and joy in what they do, being leaders on the team, having a distinct kind of confidence. They're energetic, they're yelling, they're removing their shirts."

"It was such a contrast with what we see on the news – enforcement actions, Latinos thrown to the ground and pursued. It is so easy to be disheartened right now."

Not that it's entirely straightforward to be a team supporter nowadays – for her or for the legions of other fans who show up faithfully to home games and occupy as many as half of the stadium's fifty thousand seats each time.

The Complicated Connection with the Organization

When intensified immigration raids started in Los Angeles in early June, and national guard units were deployed into the city to respond to ensuing protests, two of the local sports teams quickly issued statements of solidarity with immigrant families – while the baseball team.

The team president has said the organization want to steer clear of politics – a view colored, perhaps, by the reality that a sizable minority of the fans, including Latinos, are supporters of certain leaders. After considerable public pressure, the team later pledged $1m in support for families directly affected by the operations but made no official condemnation of the government.

Official Visit and Past Legacy

Months before, the organization did not hesitate in accepting an offer to celebrate their 2024 championship win at the official residence – a move that local writers labeled as "pathetic … spineless … and contradictory", considering the Dodgers' boast in having been the pioneering major league team to end the color barrier in the 1940s and the frequent invocations of that history and the principles it represents by executives and present and past athletes. Several players including the manager had voiced reluctance to go to the event during the first term but either changed their minds or gave in to demands from team management.

Corporate Ownership and Supporter Conflicts

A further complication for supporters is that the Dodgers are controlled by a large investment group, the ownership group, whose investments, as per sources and its own published financial documents, include a share in a detention company that operates detention centers. Guggenheim's executives has stated many times that it wants to stay out of politics, but its critics say the silence – and the financial stake – are their own form of compliance to current policies.

These factors contribute to considerable conflicted emotions among Hispanic fans in particular – sentiments that surfaced even in the excitement of this year's hard-won World Series victory and the following outpouring of Dodgers pride across Los Angeles.

"Is it okay to root for the team?" local columnist Erick Galindo agonized at the start of the playoffs in an elegant article pondering on "Dodger blue in our blood, but doubt in our hearts". He was unable to finally bring himself to view the World Series, but he still cared deeply, to the point that he believed his one-man protest must have given the squad the fortune it needed to succeed.

Separating the Players from the Management

Numerous supporters who have Galindo's reservations seem to have concluded that they can keep to support the team and its lineup of global stars, including the Asian superstar a key player, while expressing disdain on the team's corporate leadership. Nowhere was this more evident than at the victory celebration at Dodger Stadium on the following day, when the capacity crowd roared in approval of the coach and his players but jeered the executive and the chief executive of the ownership group.

"The executives in formal attire do not get to take our boys in blue from us," the fan said. "We've been with the team for more time than they have."

Historical Context and Community Effect

The issue, though, runs deeper than just the organization's current owners. The deal that brought the former franchise to Los Angeles in the late 1950s required the city razing three working-class Latino communities on a elevated area overlooking downtown and then transferring the property to the team for a small part of its actual worth. A track on a 2005 album that documents the events has an low-income parking attendant at the stadium revealing that the house he lost to eviction is now a part of the field.

A prominent commentator, perhaps the region's most widely followed Latino writer and media personality, sees a more troubling side to the lengthy, dysfunctional relationship between the franchise and its fanbase. He calls the team the popular snack of baseball, "a corporate entity with an excessive, even unhealthy devotion by too many Latinos" that has been shortchanging its fans for decades.

"They've acted around Hispanic followers while profiting from them with the other for so much time because they have been able to avoid consequences," the writer wrote over the summer, when calls to avoid the team over its absence of reaction to the raids were upended by the uncomfortable fact that turnout at matches remained steady, even at the peak of the protests when downtown LA was subject to a evening restriction.

Global Players and Fan Connections

Distinguishing the team from its corporate owners is not a simple matter, {