🔗 Share this article

The count of guaranteed positions for Indigenous council members on NZ councils will be slashed by more than half, after a controversial legislative amendment that required local governments to put the future of hard-earned Indigenous wards to a popular referendum.

Background Information on Indigenous Representation

Indigenous electoral districts, which can include one or more elected officials based on local population numbers, were established in 2001 to provide Indigenous voters the choice to elect a guaranteed Indigenous council member in municipal and provincial governments. Initially, local governments could only establish a Indigenous seat by first submitting it to a community referendum in their area. Communities often spent years generating local support and urging their councils to establish Indigenous representation.

Legislative Shifts and Administrative Decisions

To remedy the issue, the former administration allowed local councils to establish a Indigenous seat without initially mandating them to subject it to a public vote.

However, this year, the right-wing coalition government overturned the policy, stating communities ought to determine whether to introduce Indigenous representation.

Voting Outcomes

The coalition’s law change mandated local authorities that had created a electoral district under Labour’s rules to conduct decisive public votes concurrently with the municipal polls, which concluded on 11 October. Of 42 councils taking part in the referendum, 17 decided to keep their seats, and 25 to disestablish theirs – showing many regions against reserved Indigenous seats.

These outcomes provided “a crucial move in reinstating community self-determination.”

Critics nevertheless have condemned the government’s law change as “discriminatory” and “anti-Māori”. After assuming power, the current administration has implemented extensive reversals to measures intended to enhance Māori health, wellbeing and representation. The government has said it aims to end “ethnic-specific” approaches, and says it is dedicated to improving outcomes for Māori and every citizen.

Geographical Splits

Outcomes of the public votes were split down urban-rural lines – most urban centers mandated to hold referendums backed Indigenous seats, while countryside areas leaned strongly towards removing them.

“It's unfortunate for the Indigenous seats that had recently been established – they’re just beginning to find their footing.”

Voter Turnout and Criticism

The recent municipal polls registered the smallest electoral participation in 36 years, with under one-third of eligible voters casting a vote, prompting calls for an overhaul.

The process had been “a farce”.

Comparative Treatment

Local governments are permitted to establish different electoral districts – such as countryside seats – without initially mandating a public vote. The disparate requirements placed on Māori wards suggested the administration was singling out Māori representation.

“Ultimately, they were unsuccessful. Numerous localities have given the government a middle finger response.”

This statement referred to the 17 areas that chose to retain their seats.