🔗 Share this article

As a DM, I traditionally shied away from heavy use of luck during my Dungeons & Dragons sessions. I tended was for story direction and session development to be shaped by character actions rather than random chance. That said, I decided to change my approach, and I'm truly pleased with the outcome.

The Catalyst: Observing an Improvised Tool

An influential actual-play show showcases a DM who often asks for "fate rolls" from the players. This involves selecting a polyhedral and defining potential outcomes based on the roll. It's at its core no unlike using a random table, these are created in the moment when a character's decision lacks a predetermined outcome.

I decided to try this technique at my own game, primarily because it seemed interesting and offered a departure from my normal practice. The outcome were fantastic, prompting me to reflect on the ongoing tension between pre-determination and improvisation in a D&D campaign.

A Memorable Story Beat

During one session, my players had survived a massive fight. Afterwards, a cleric character wondered if two friendly NPCs—a sibling duo—had survived. Instead of picking a fate, I asked for a roll. I asked the player to make a twenty-sided die roll. The stakes were: a low roll, both were killed; on a 5-9, a single one would die; a high roll, they made it.

The die came up a 4. This resulted in a incredibly moving scene where the characters discovered the bodies of their allies, still clasped together in death. The cleric performed a ceremony, which was uniquely meaningful due to previous roleplaying. As a parting gesture, I decided that the remains were miraculously transformed, containing a magical Prayer Bead. I rolled for, the item's contained spell was perfectly what the group lacked to solve another major situation. One just orchestrate this type of serendipitous moments.

Sharpening On-the-Spot Skills

This incident caused me to question if randomization and thinking on your feet are truly the core of tabletop RPGs. Although you are a meticulously planning DM, your ability to adapt can rust. Players frequently find joy in derailing the most carefully laid narratives. Therefore, a good DM needs to be able to think quickly and invent details in real-time.

Utilizing similar mechanics is a excellent way to practice these skills without going completely outside your preparation. The trick is to use them for small-scale decisions that won't drastically alter the session's primary direction. As an example, I would avoid using it to determine if the central plot figure is a traitor. Instead, I could use it to figure out if the party enter a room just in time to see a critical event unfolds.

Strengthening Shared Narrative

Spontaneous randomization also helps make players feel invested and create the sensation that the story is alive, evolving according to their actions immediately. It prevents the perception that they are merely characters in a pre-written script, thereby enhancing the collaborative aspect of roleplaying.

Randomization has historically been integral to the core of D&D. The game's roots were enamored with encounter generators, which fit a game focused on exploration. While current D&D often focuses on story and character, leading many DMs to feel they require detailed plans, it's not necessarily the best approach.

Finding the Right Balance

There is absolutely nothing wrong with doing your prep. However, it's also fine no issue with letting go and permitting the dice to determine certain outcomes instead of you. Direction is a significant factor in a DM's role. We require it to facilitate play, yet we can be reluctant to give some up, at times when doing so can lead to great moments.

A piece of advice is this: Don't be afraid of temporarily losing control. Embrace a little improvisation for inconsequential story elements. The result could find that the unexpected outcome is infinitely more powerful than anything you might have pre-written by yourself.