By Terminating a Cruel Conservative Social Experiment, This Budget Definitively Sets Out How the Labour Party Will Fight the Battle to Revitalize Britain
Yesterday, the chancellor, Rachel Reeves, delivered a Labour Party budget. People have been calling for Labour’s mission and values to be more distinctly articulated. By way of the decisions made – a transition to a more equitable tax system, targeting wealth to pay for addressing child poverty, quality public services and the cost of living – we have unequivocally set out what we stand for.
This is why Labour MPs applauded in the Commons, and it’s why we are up for the fights to come. And it’s why the protests from the right began right away.
The Main Dividing Line in UK Government
The primary division in British politics is yet again on the economy. On the one side Labour, who want to change it so it helps everyday working people, and on the opposite side, our political opponents, who support the status quo and the failed ideology of the past. We must now take on, and prevail in, the argument.
The Tories were given 14 years to fix things and instead, by every standard, they got much worse. Their ideological austerity and supply-side economics – tax breaks for the wealthy, reducing investment (causing us with poor productivity and wages), and failing to support young people post-Covid – proved ineffective.
Record of Failure Under the Previous Government
Living standards fell by the biggest amount since records began, child poverty hit record levels, NHS waiting lists in England were the highest on record, wages remained flat, a housing crisis took hold, young people scarred by Covid were left on the scrapheap. The record of failure continues.
A single budget alone can’t put all this right, so Labour has a comprehensive plan for rebuilding and for rewiring the country. And we have to go out and keep making the argument for why our strategy will yield benefits.
Welfare Spending and Child Poverty
During the Tories, welfare spending significantly increased. As did child poverty, because they didn’t address the underlying issues: low pay, high housing costs, significant inequalities in education, health and regions. The state ends up paying more to deal with the effects instead of the solution.
That’s why we are building more affordable homes than for a generation, raising wages and new rights for workers, massively boosting investment in infrastructure and new industries, getting waiting lists down and lowering the costs of childcare and energy as we drive for clean power.
Removing the Two-Child Benefit Cap
It’s also why we are absolutely right to use this budget to remove the two-child benefit cap.
For almost a decade, since it was introduced, poorer families with children have endured from a cruel social experiment that was branded as fair for working people when it was the opposite. Most of the families affected by it have a parent in work.
It has only served to push 300,000 more children into poverty – which, ultimately, costs us more, as well as being heartless and unethical.
Real Impact in Communities
I know from my own constituency – where over 5,000 children will be lifted out of poverty as a result of abolishing the cap – the actual impact it’s had. Children wearing low-cost wellies as school shoes, children going to bed hungry and cold, living in overcrowded, mouldy homes, parents this Christmas relying on food banks for a modest meal or small gift for their kids.
I also see the impact on schools, teachers, social workers, doctors and charities who are already overburdened but have to divert time and resources to supporting children who are living with the results of severe deprivation.
Lasting Effects of Youth Hardship
Just one in four pupils from the poorest families achieve five good GCSEs, compared with nearly three in four among wealthier families. This predisposes them for the challenges they face throughout their lives: missed potential, financial struggles and poor health. Children who grew up in poverty are more likely to be jobless or poor as adults.
Confronting child poverty isn’t just a moral imperative, it is a long-term investment. Poverty costs the economy significantly more than the three billion pound cost of lifting the two-child cap, or expanding free school meals.
That’s why we acted urgently in the budget, despite the very difficult economic context. Every day with this cap in place sees over a hundred additional children pushed into poverty. The effects of lifting it will not occur overnight either, so taking early action in the parliament was vital.
The cap was a totem to 14 years of failed rightwing ideology. Now it is abolished.
Equitable Financing for Policies
We, as Labour, can also be clear that these initiatives are being paid for in a just way – from a new gaming tax, eliminating tax loopholes and a new “mansion tax”.
Conclusion
Equity and direction – that’s how we will succeed in the contest of ideas. This budget is a clear statement that we won the election as Labour, and will govern as Labour. As I repeatedly said during my campaign to become deputy leader, we must seize back the political megaphone and define the narrative more forcefully about what’s truly flawed with the country and how we are repairing it. We’ve certainly done that this week.
So let’s maintain it and win this struggle about how we will renew Britain and tackle the entrenched inequalities holding us back.